Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
NVIDIA GeForce 8700M GT SLI vs AMD Radeon R5 M330
Combined performance score
Radeon R5 M330 outperforms GeForce 8700M GT SLI by 97% in our combined benchmark results.
General info
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in performance ranking | 925 | 1108 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Value for money | no data | 0.01 |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) | G8x (2007−2008) |
GPU code name | Exo Pro DDR3 | NB8E-SE |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Release date | 7 May 2015 (8 years old) | 18 September 2007 (16 years old) |
Current price | no data | $545 |
Technical specs
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 320 | 64 |
Compute units | 5 | no data |
Core clock speed | 1030 MHz | 625 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1030 MHz | no data |
Number of transistors | 690 million | 578 Million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 80 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 18 Watt | 58 Watt |
Texture fill rate | 20.60 | no data |
Floating-point performance | 659.2 gflops | no data |
Size and compatibility
Information on Radeon R5 M330 and GeForce 8700M GT SLI compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
Laptop size | no data | large |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | no data |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | no data |
Supplementary power connectors | None | no data |
Memory
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | 800 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | no data |
Shared memory | - | - |
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Display Connectors | No outputs | no data |
Technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
AppAcceleration | - | no data |
Enduro | - | no data |
HD3D | + | no data |
PowerTune | + | no data |
DualGraphics | 1 | no data |
TrueAudio | - | no data |
ZeroCore | + | no data |
Switchable graphics | 1 | no data |
API support
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | DirectX® 12 | 10 |
Shader Model | 5.0 | no data |
OpenGL | 4.4 | no data |
OpenCL | Not Listed | no data |
Vulkan | + | no data |
Mantle | + | no data |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
Full HD | 9
+125%
| 4−5
−125%
|
Performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
+33.3%
|
3−4
−33.3%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Battlefield 5 | 1−2 | 0−1 |
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 10−11
+25%
|
8−9
−25%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
+33.3%
|
3−4
−33.3%
|
Far Cry 5 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Forza Horizon 4 | 2−3
+100%
|
1−2
−100%
|
Hitman 3 | 2−3
+100%
|
1−2
−100%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 2−3
+100%
|
1−2
−100%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 4−5
+33.3%
|
3−4
−33.3%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 7−8
+16.7%
|
6−7
−16.7%
|
Full HD
High Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Battlefield 5 | 1−2 | 0−1 |
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 10−11
+25%
|
8−9
−25%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
+33.3%
|
3−4
−33.3%
|
Far Cry 5 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Forza Horizon 4 | 2−3
+100%
|
1−2
−100%
|
Hitman 3 | 2−3
+100%
|
1−2
−100%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 2−3
+100%
|
1−2
−100%
|
Metro Exodus | 2−3
+100%
|
1−2
−100%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 4−5
+33.3%
|
3−4
−33.3%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 7−8
+16.7%
|
6−7
−16.7%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 4−5
+33.3%
|
3−4
−33.3%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Battlefield 5 | 1−2 | 0−1 |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
+33.3%
|
3−4
−33.3%
|
Far Cry 5 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Forza Horizon 4 | 2−3
+100%
|
1−2
−100%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 4−5
+33.3%
|
3−4
−33.3%
|
1440p
High Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 4−5
+33.3%
|
3−4
−33.3%
|
Hitman 3 | 4−5
+33.3%
|
3−4
−33.3%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 9−10
+12.5%
|
8−9
−12.5%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 5−6
+25%
|
4−5
−25%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 2−3
+100%
|
1−2
−100%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 2−3
+100%
|
1−2
−100%
|
4K
High Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 2−3
+100%
|
1−2
−100%
|
Hitman 3 | 2−3
+100%
|
1−2
−100%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 8−9
+0%
|
8−9
+0%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
4K
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Far Cry 5 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
This is how R5 M330 and 8700M GT SLI compete in popular games:
1080p resolution:
- R5 M330 is 125% faster than 8700M GT SLI
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Metro Exodus, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the R5 M330 is 100% faster than the 8700M GT SLI.
All in all, in popular games:
- R5 M330 is ahead in 21 test (84%)
- there's a draw in 4 tests (16%)
Advantages and disadvantages
Performance score | 1.54 | 0.78 |
Recency | 7 May 2015 | 18 September 2007 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
Chip lithography | 28 nm | 80 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 18 Watt | 58 Watt |
The Radeon R5 M330 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 8700M GT SLI in performance tests.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar GPU comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.