ATI FirePro V9800P vs Radeon R5 M330

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1018not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency6.01no data
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameExoCypress
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date5 May 2015 (10 years ago)9 September 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$2,499

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3201600
Compute units5no data
Core clock speed955 MHz850 MHz
Boost clock speed1030 MHzno data
Number of transistors690 million2,154 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt225 Watt
Texture fill rate20.6068.00
Floating-point processing power0.6592 TFLOPS2.72 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs2080

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz1150 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s147.2 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DisplayPort

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

HD3D+-
PowerTune+-
DualGraphics+-
ZeroCore+-
Switchable graphics+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1211.2 (11_0)
Shader Model5.05.0
OpenGL4.44.4
OpenCLNot Listed1.2
Vulkan+N/A
Mantle+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 May 2015 9 September 2010
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 225 Watt

R5 M330 has an age advantage of 4 years, a 42.9% more advanced lithography process, and 1150% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R5 M330 and FirePro V9800P. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R5 M330 is a notebook graphics card while FirePro V9800P is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R5 M330
Radeon R5 M330
ATI FirePro V9800P
FirePro V9800P

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 1168 votes

Rate Radeon R5 M330 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate FirePro V9800P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R5 M330 or FirePro V9800P, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.