ATI Rage 128 GL vs Radeon R5 M240
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 1069 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 (2011−2020) | Rage 4 (1998−1999) |
| GPU code name | Jet | Rage 4 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 18 September 2014 (10 years ago) | 1 August 1998 (26 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 320 | no data |
| Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | 80 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 690 million | 8 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 250 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 20.60 | 0.16 |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.6592 TFLOPS | no data |
| ROPs | 8 | 2 |
| TMUs | 20 | 2 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Bus support | Not Listed | no data |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | AGP 2x |
| Width | no data | 1-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | Not Listed | SDR |
| Maximum RAM amount | 0 MB | 32 MB |
| Memory bus width | Not Listed | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | no data | 60 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | 960.0 MB/s |
| Shared memory | - | no data |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x VGA |
| Eyefinity | + | - |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| AppAcceleration | + | - |
| HD3D | + | - |
| PowerTune | + | - |
| DualGraphics | + | - |
| ZeroCore | + | - |
| Switchable graphics | + | - |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | DirectX® 11 | 6.0 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | no data |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 1.2 |
| OpenCL | Not Listed | N/A |
| Vulkan | - | N/A |
| Mantle | + | - |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 18 September 2014 | 1 August 1998 |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 250 nm |
R5 M240 has an age advantage of 16 years, and a 792.9% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Radeon R5 M240 and Rage 128 GL. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Radeon R5 M240 is a notebook card while Rage 128 GL is a workstation one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
