ATI Radeon HD 4350 PCIe x1 vs R5 M240

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1107not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameJetRV710
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date18 September 2014 (11 years ago)30 September 2008 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores32080
Core clock speed1000 MHz600 MHz
Number of transistors690 million242 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data20 Watt
Texture fill rate20.604.800
Floating-point processing power0.6592 TFLOPS0.096 TFLOPS
ROPs84
TMUs208
L1 Cache80 KB16 KB
L2 Cache128 KB64 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportNot Listedno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 2.0 x1
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeNot ListedDDR2
Maximum RAM amount0 MB512 MB
Memory bus widthNot Listed64 Bit
Memory clock speedno data400 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s6.4 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video
Eyefinity+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration+-
HD3D+-
PowerTune+-
DualGraphics+-
ZeroCore+-
Switchable graphics+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1110.1 (10_1)
Shader Model5.14.1
OpenGL4.43.3
OpenCLNot Listed1.1
Vulkan-N/A
Mantle+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 18 September 2014 30 September 2008
Chip lithography 28 nm 55 nm

R5 M240 has an age advantage of 5 years, and a 96.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R5 M240 and Radeon HD 4350 PCIe x1. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R5 M240 is a notebook graphics card while Radeon HD 4350 PCIe x1 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R5 M240
Radeon R5 M240
ATI Radeon HD 4350 PCIe x1
Radeon HD 4350 PCIe x1

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 57 votes

Rate Radeon R5 M240 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 3 votes

Rate Radeon HD 4350 PCIe x1 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R5 M240 or Radeon HD 4350 PCIe x1, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.