ATI Radeon 9550 XT vs R5 M240

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1101not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Rage 8 (2002−2007)
GPU code nameJetRV350
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date18 September 2014 (10 years ago)4 May 2005 (20 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores320no data
Core clock speed1000 MHz425 MHz
Number of transistors690 million60 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm130 nm
Texture fill rate20.601.700
Floating-point processing power0.6592 TFLOPSno data
ROPs84
TMUs204

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportNot Listedno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8AGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeNot ListedDDR
Maximum RAM amount0 MB128 MB
Memory bus widthNot Listed128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data325 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s10.4 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video
Eyefinity+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration+-
HD3D+-
PowerTune+-
DualGraphics+-
ZeroCore+-
Switchable graphics+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 119.0 (9_0)
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.42.0
OpenCLNot ListedN/A
Vulkan-N/A
Mantle+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 18 September 2014 4 May 2005
Chip lithography 28 nm 130 nm

R5 M240 has an age advantage of 9 years, and a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R5 M240 and Radeon 9550 XT. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R5 M240 is a notebook graphics card while Radeon 9550 XT is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R5 M240
Radeon R5 M240
ATI Radeon 9550 XT
Radeon 9550 XT

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 56 votes

Rate Radeon R5 M240 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 9 votes

Rate Radeon 9550 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R5 M240 or Radeon 9550 XT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.