Quadro4 200 NVS vs Radeon R5 M240

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking	1033	not rated
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Architecture	GCN (2011−2017)	Celsius (1999−2005)
GPU code name	Jet XT / Sun	NV17 A3
Market segment	Laptop	Workstation
Release date	1 September 2014 (9 years ago)	22 December 2003 (20 years ago)
Current price	no data	$22

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	320	no data
Core clock speed	1030 MHz	250 MHz
Number of transistors	690 million	29 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	no data	11 Watt
Texture fill rate	20.60	1.000
Floating-point performance	659.2 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon R5 M240 and Quadro4 200 NVS compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Bus support	Not Listed	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	AGP 4x
Length	no data	168 mm
Width	no data	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	Not Listed	DDR
Maximum RAM amount	0 MB	64 MB
Memory bus width	Not Listed	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	no data	500 MHz
Memory bandwidth	14.4 GB/s	8 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x LFH60
Eyefinity	+	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration	+	no data
Enduro	-	no data
HD3D	+	no data
PowerTune	+	no data
DualGraphics	1	no data
TrueAudio	-	no data
ZeroCore	+	no data
Switchable graphics	1	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	DirectX® 11	8.0
Shader Model	5.1	no data
OpenGL	4.4	1.3
OpenCL	Not Listed	N/A
Vulkan	no data	N/A
Mantle	+	no data

Pros & cons summary

---

Recency	1 September 2014	22 December 2003
Chip lithography	28 nm	150 nm

---

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

---