Quadro K2000M Embedded vs Radeon R5 M240

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1117not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameJetEXK107
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date18 September 2014 (11 years ago)22 March 2012 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores320384
Core clock speed1000 MHz835 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1058 MHz
Number of transistors690 million1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data45 Watt
Texture fill rate20.6033.86
Floating-point processing power0.6592 TFLOPS0.8125 TFLOPS
ROPs816
TMUs2032
L1 Cache80 KB32 KB
L2 Cache128 KB256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportNot Listedno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeNot ListedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount0 MB2 GB
Memory bus widthNot Listed128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data900 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s57.6 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI
Eyefinity+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration+-
HD3D+-
PowerTune+-
DualGraphics+-
ZeroCore+-
Switchable graphics+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1111.0 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.44.1
OpenCLNot Listed3.0
Vulkan-N/A
Mantle+-
CUDA-3.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 18 September 2014 22 March 2012

R5 M240 has an age advantage of 2 years.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R5 M240 and Quadro K2000M Embedded. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R5 M240 is a notebook graphics card while Quadro K2000M Embedded is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R5 M240
Radeon R5 M240
NVIDIA Quadro K2000M Embedded
Quadro K2000M Embedded

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 56 votes

Rate Radeon R5 M240 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1 vote

Rate Quadro K2000M Embedded on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R5 M240 or Quadro K2000M Embedded, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.