GeForce 9600 GT Rev. 2 vs Radeon R5 M240

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1107not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameJetG94B
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date18 September 2014 (11 years ago)21 February 2008 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$179

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores32064
Core clock speed1000 MHz650 MHz
Number of transistors690 million505 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data95 Watt
Texture fill rate20.6020.80
Floating-point processing power0.6592 TFLOPS0.208 TFLOPS
ROPs816
TMUs2032
L1 Cache80 KBno data
L2 Cache128 KB64 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportNot Listedno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data229 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeNot ListedGDDR3
Maximum RAM amount0 MB512 MB
Memory bus widthNot Listed256 Bit
Memory clock speedno data900 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s57.6 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x S-Video
Eyefinity+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration+-
HD3D+-
PowerTune+-
DualGraphics+-
ZeroCore+-
Switchable graphics+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1111.1 (10_0)
Shader Model5.14.0
OpenGL4.43.3
OpenCLNot Listed1.1
Vulkan-N/A
Mantle+-
CUDA-1.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 18 September 2014 21 February 2008
Chip lithography 28 nm 55 nm

R5 M240 has an age advantage of 6 years, and a 96.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R5 M240 and GeForce 9600 GT Rev. 2. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R5 M240 is a notebook graphics card while GeForce 9600 GT Rev. 2 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R5 M240
Radeon R5 M240
NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT Rev. 2
GeForce 9600 GT Rev. 2

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 57 votes

Rate Radeon R5 M240 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2 5 votes

Rate GeForce 9600 GT Rev. 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R5 M240 or GeForce 9600 GT Rev. 2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.