ATI FirePro V9800 vs Radeon R5 M240

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1109not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameJetCypress
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date18 September 2014 (11 years ago)9 September 2010 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$3,499

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3201600
Core clock speed1000 MHz850 MHz
Number of transistors690 million2,154 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data250 Watt
Texture fill rate20.6068.00
Floating-point processing power0.6592 TFLOPS2.72 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs2080
L1 Cache80 KB160 KB
L2 Cache128 KB512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportNot Listedno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeNot ListedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount0 MB4 GB
Memory bus widthNot Listed256 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1150 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s147.2 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x S-Video
Eyefinity+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration+-
HD3D+-
PowerTune+-
DualGraphics+-
ZeroCore+-
Switchable graphics+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1111.2 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.0
OpenGL4.44.4
OpenCLNot Listed1.2
Vulkan-N/A
Mantle+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 18 September 2014 9 September 2010
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm

R5 M240 has an age advantage of 4 years, and a 43% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R5 M240 and FirePro V9800. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R5 M240 is a notebook graphics card while FirePro V9800 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 57 votes

Rate Radeon R5 M240 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 4 votes

Rate FirePro V9800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R5 M240 or FirePro V9800, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.