Radeon RX Vega 56 Mobile vs R5 M240 Rebrand

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameMarsVega 10
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date10 January 2014 (12 years ago)1 June 2018 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3843584
Core clock speed650 MHz1138 MHz
Boost clock speed700 MHz1301 MHz
Number of transistors950 million12,500 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data120 Watt
Texture fill rate16.80291.4
Floating-point processing power0.5376 TFLOPS9.326 TFLOPS
ROPs864
TMUs24224
L1 Cache96 KB896 KB
L2 Cache128 KB4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3HBM2
Maximum RAM amount1 GB8 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit2048 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s409.6 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.1.125

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 January 2014 1 June 2018
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm

RX Vega 56 Mobile has an age advantage of 4 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R5 M240 Rebrand and Radeon RX Vega 56 Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R5 M240 Rebrand
Radeon R5 M240 Rebrand
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 Mobile
Radeon RX Vega 56 Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 8 votes

Rate Radeon R5 M240 Rebrand on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 7 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 56 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R5 M240 Rebrand or Radeon RX Vega 56 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.