Radeon 680M vs R5 M240 Rebrand

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated507
Place by popularitynot in top-10086
Power efficiencyno data14.05
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameMarsRembrandt+
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date10 January 2014 (11 years ago)3 January 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384768
Core clock speed650 MHz2000 MHz
Boost clock speed700 MHz2200 MHz
Number of transistors950 million13,100 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data50 Watt
Texture fill rate16.80105.6
Floating-point processing power0.5376 TFLOPS3.379 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs2448
Ray Tracing Coresno data12
L0 Cacheno data192 KB
L1 Cache96 KB256 KB
L2 Cache128 KB2 MB
L3 Cacheno data8 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount1 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed900 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 January 2014 3 January 2023
Chip lithography 28 nm 6 nm

Radeon 680M has an age advantage of 8 years, and a 366.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R5 M240 Rebrand and Radeon 680M. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R5 M240 Rebrand
Radeon R5 M240 Rebrand
AMD Radeon 680M
Radeon 680M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 4 votes

Rate Radeon R5 M240 Rebrand on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 1124 votes

Rate Radeon 680M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R5 M240 Rebrand or Radeon 680M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.