Quadro 5000 SDI vs Radeon R5 M240 Rebrand

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameMarsGF100
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date10 January 2014 (11 years ago)23 February 2011 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$7,899

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384352
Core clock speed650 MHz513 MHz
Boost clock speed700 MHzno data
Number of transistors950 million3,100 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data172 Watt
Texture fill rate16.8022.57
Floating-point processing power0.5376 TFLOPS0.7223 TFLOPS
ROPs840
TMUs2444
L1 Cache96 KB704 KB
L2 Cache128 KB640 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data248 mm
Widthno dataQuad-slot

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1 GB2.5 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit320 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz750 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s120.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video, 2x SDI

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA-2.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 January 2014 23 February 2011
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 2.5 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm

R5 M240 Rebrand has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

5000 SDI, on the other hand, has a 150% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R5 M240 Rebrand and Quadro 5000 SDI. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R5 M240 Rebrand is a notebook graphics card while Quadro 5000 SDI is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R5 M240 Rebrand
Radeon R5 M240 Rebrand
NVIDIA Quadro 5000 SDI
Quadro 5000 SDI

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 8 votes

Rate Radeon R5 M240 Rebrand on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate Quadro 5000 SDI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R5 M240 Rebrand or Quadro 5000 SDI, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.