GeForce GTX 460 v2 ES vs Radeon R5 M240 Rebrand

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code nameMarsGF114
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date10 January 2014 (11 years ago)24 September 2011 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384336
Core clock speed650 MHz779 MHz
Boost clock speed700 MHzno data
Number of transistors950 million1,950 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data160 Watt
Texture fill rate16.8043.62
Floating-point processing power0.5376 TFLOPS1.046 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs2456
L1 Cache96 KB448 KB
L2 Cache128 KB512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data210 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1 GB1280 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz1002 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s128.3 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA-2.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 January 2014 24 September 2011
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 1280 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm

R5 M240 Rebrand has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

GTX 460 v2 ES, on the other hand, has a 25% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R5 M240 Rebrand and GeForce GTX 460 v2 ES. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R5 M240 Rebrand is a notebook graphics card while GeForce GTX 460 v2 ES is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R5 M240 Rebrand
Radeon R5 M240 Rebrand
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 v2 ES
GeForce GTX 460 v2 ES

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 8 votes

Rate Radeon R5 M240 Rebrand on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.2 16 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 460 v2 ES on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R5 M240 Rebrand or GeForce GTX 460 v2 ES, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.