FirePro V7900 SDI vs Radeon R5 M240 Rebrand

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)
GPU code nameMarsCayman
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date10 January 2014 (12 years ago)24 May 2011 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3841280
Core clock speed650 MHz725 MHz
Boost clock speed700 MHzno data
Number of transistors950 million2,640 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data224 Watt
Texture fill rate16.8058.00
Floating-point processing power0.5376 TFLOPS1.856 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs2480
L1 Cache96 KB320 KB
L2 Cache128 KB512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCIe 2.1 x16
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data279 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Form factorno datafull height / full length
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1 GB2 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s160 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x SDI
StereoOutput3D-+
DisplayPort countno data4
Dual-link DVI support-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.0
OpenGL4.64.4
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 January 2014 24 May 2011
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm

R5 M240 Rebrand has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 43% more advanced lithography process.

V7900 SDI, on the other hand, has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R5 M240 Rebrand and FirePro V7900 SDI. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R5 M240 Rebrand is a notebook graphics card while FirePro V7900 SDI is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 8 votes

Rate Radeon R5 M240 Rebrand on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate FirePro V7900 SDI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R5 M240 Rebrand or FirePro V7900 SDI, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.