FirePro M4150 vs Radeon R5 M240 Rebrand

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated880
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameMarsOpal
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date10 January 2014 (12 years ago)16 October 2013 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384384
Core clock speed650 MHz715 MHz
Boost clock speed700 MHzno data
Number of transistors950 million950 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Texture fill rate16.8017.16
Floating-point processing power0.5376 TFLOPS0.5491 TFLOPS
ROPs88
TMUs2424
L1 Cache96 KB96 KB
L2 Cache128 KB256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x8

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1 GB1 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s64 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (11_1)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 January 2014 16 October 2013

R5 M240 Rebrand has an age advantage of 2 months.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R5 M240 Rebrand and FirePro M4150. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R5 M240 Rebrand is a notebook graphics card while FirePro M4150 is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 8 votes

Rate Radeon R5 M240 Rebrand on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 17 votes

Rate FirePro M4150 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R5 M240 Rebrand or FirePro M4150, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.