ATI 3D Rage LT PRO AGP vs Radeon R5 M240 Rebrand

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)no data
GPU code nameMarsRage LT
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date10 January 2014 (12 years ago)1 November 1997 (28 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384no data
Core clock speed650 MHz75 MHz
Boost clock speed700 MHzno data
Number of transistors950 million8 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm350 nm
Texture fill rate16.800.08
Floating-point processing power0.5376 TFLOPSno data
ROPs81
TMUs241
L1 Cache96 KBno data
L2 Cache128 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8AGP 2x
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3SDR
Maximum RAM amount1 GB8 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz100 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s800 MB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)6.0
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.61.1
OpenCL1.2None
Vulkan1.2.131-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 January 2014 1 November 1997
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 8 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 350 nm

R5 M240 Rebrand has an age advantage of 16 years, a 12700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1150% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R5 M240 Rebrand and 3D Rage LT PRO AGP. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R5 M240 Rebrand is a notebook graphics card while 3D Rage LT PRO AGP is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 13 votes

Rate Radeon R5 M240 Rebrand on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 3 votes

Rate 3D Rage LT PRO AGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R5 M240 Rebrand or 3D Rage LT PRO AGP, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.