FirePro S10000 Passive vs Radeon R5 M230 Rebrand

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameSunTahiti
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date1 March 2013 (12 years ago)12 November 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$3,599

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3203584 ×2
Core clock speed750 MHz825 MHz
Boost clock speed825 MHz950 MHz
Number of transistors690 million4,313 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data750 Watt
Texture fill rate16.50106.4 ×2
Floating-point processing power0.528 TFLOPS3.405 TFLOPS ×2
ROPs832 ×2
TMUs20112 ×2

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCIe 3.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data305 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Form factorno datafull height / full length
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB6 GB ×2
Memory bus width64 Bit384 Bit ×2
Memory clock speed900 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s480 GB/s ×2

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x mini-DisplayPort
Dual-link DVI support-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (11_1)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 March 2013 12 November 2012
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 6 GB

R5 M230 Rebrand has an age advantage of 3 months.

S10000 Passive, on the other hand, has a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R5 M230 Rebrand and FirePro S10000 Passive. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R5 M230 Rebrand is a notebook graphics card while FirePro S10000 Passive is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R5 M230 Rebrand
Radeon R5 M230 Rebrand
AMD FirePro S10000 Passive
FirePro S10000 Passive

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 9 votes

Rate Radeon R5 M230 Rebrand on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 5 votes

Rate FirePro S10000 Passive on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R5 M230 Rebrand or FirePro S10000 Passive, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.