ATI FireGL X3-256 vs Radeon R5 M230 Rebrand

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)R400 (2004−2008)
GPU code nameSunR420
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date1 March 2013 (13 years ago)3 August 2004 (21 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,099

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores320no data
Core clock speed750 MHz491 MHz
Boost clock speed825 MHzno data
Number of transistors690 million160 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data57 Watt
Texture fill rate16.505.892
Floating-point processing power0.528 TFLOPSno data
ROPs812
TMUs2012
L1 Cache80 KBno data
L2 Cache128 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8AGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x Molex

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount2 GB256 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz454 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s29.06 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)9.0b (9_2)
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 March 2013 3 August 2004
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 130 nm

R5 M230 Rebrand has an age advantage of 8 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 364% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R5 M230 Rebrand and FireGL X3-256. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R5 M230 Rebrand is a notebook graphics card while FireGL X3-256 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 11 votes

Rate Radeon R5 M230 Rebrand on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate FireGL X3-256 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R5 M230 Rebrand or FireGL X3-256, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.