ATI FireGL 9700 X1-256 vs Radeon R5 (Kaveri)

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1122not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 1.1 (2014)Rage 8 (2002−2007)
GPU code nameKaveriR300
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date4 June 2014 (11 years ago)1 July 2002 (23 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores256no data
Core clock speed514 MHz325 MHz
Boost clock speed626 MHzno data
Number of transistors2410 Million110 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data37 Watt
Texture fill rateno data2.600
ROPsno data8
TMUsno data8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Interfaceno dataAGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataDDR
Maximum RAM amountno data256 MB
Memory bus width64/128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speedno data310 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data19.84 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data2x DVI

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (FL 12_0)9.0 (9_0)
OpenGLno data2.0
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 June 2014 1 July 2002
Chip lithography 28 nm 150 nm

R5 (Kaveri) has an age advantage of 11 years, and a 435.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R5 (Kaveri) and FireGL 9700 X1-256. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R5 (Kaveri) is a notebook graphics card while FireGL 9700 X1-256 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R5 (Kaveri)
Radeon R5 (Kaveri)
ATI FireGL 9700 X1-256
FireGL 9700 X1-256

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 7 votes

Rate Radeon R5 (Kaveri) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate FireGL 9700 X1-256 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R5 (Kaveri) or FireGL 9700 X1-256, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.