Tesla M40 vs Radeon R5 Graphics

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated258
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data7.53
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameSpectre SLGM200
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date17 September 2014 (11 years ago)10 November 2015 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2563072
Core clock speed497 MHz948 MHz
Boost clock speed720 MHz1112 MHz
Number of transistors2,410 million8,000 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate7.952213.5
Floating-point processing power0.2545 TFLOPS6.832 TFLOPS
ROPs496
TMUs16192
L1 Cacheno data1.1 MB
L2 Cacheno data3 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data8-pin EPS

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared12 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared384 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1502 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data288.4 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.06.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA-5.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 17 September 2014 10 November 2015
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 250 Watt

R5 Graphics has 1567% lower power consumption.

Tesla M40, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R5 Graphics and Tesla M40. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R5 Graphics is a desktop graphics card while Tesla M40 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 1825 votes

Rate Radeon R5 Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 94 votes

Rate Tesla M40 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R5 Graphics or Tesla M40, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.