Radeon HD 7400G vs R5 Graphics

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1173
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data2.79
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)
GPU code nameSpectre SLScrapper
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date17 September 2014 (10 years ago)2 October 2012 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores256192
Core clock speed497 MHz327 MHz
Boost clock speed720 MHz424 MHz
Number of transistors2,410 million1,303 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm32 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt17 Watt
Texture fill rate7.9525.088
Floating-point processing power0.2545 TFLOPS0.1628 TFLOPS
ROPs44
TMUs1612

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfaceIGPIGP
WidthIGPno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model6.05.0
OpenGL4.64.4
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 17 September 2014 2 October 2012
Chip lithography 28 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 17 Watt

R5 Graphics has an age advantage of 1 year, a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 13.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R5 Graphics and Radeon HD 7400G. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R5 Graphics is a desktop card while Radeon HD 7400G is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
Radeon R5 Graphics
AMD Radeon HD 7400G
Radeon HD 7400G

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 1553 votes

Rate Radeon R5 Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 89 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7400G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.