FirePro M6000 vs Radeon R5 Graphics

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated690
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data7.70
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameSpectre SLHeathrow
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date17 September 2014 (10 years ago)1 July 2012 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores256640
Core clock speed497 MHz800 MHz
Boost clock speed720 MHzno data
Number of transistors2,410 million1,500 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt43 Watt
Texture fill rate7.95232.00
Floating-point processing power0.2545 TFLOPS1.024 TFLOPS
ROPs416
TMUs1640

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
Bus supportno datan/a
InterfaceIGPMXM-B (3.0)
WidthIGPno data
Form factorno dataMXM-B
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared2 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data72 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
StereoOutput3D-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (11_1)
Shader Model6.05.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 17 September 2014 1 July 2012
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 43 Watt

R5 Graphics has an age advantage of 2 years, and 186.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R5 Graphics and FirePro M6000. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R5 Graphics is a desktop graphics card while FirePro M6000 is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
Radeon R5 Graphics
AMD FirePro M6000
FirePro M6000

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 1678 votes

Rate Radeon R5 Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 15 votes

Rate FirePro M6000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R5 Graphics or FirePro M6000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.