CMP 170HX 8 GB vs Radeon R5 Graphics

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameSpectre SLGA100
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date17 September 2014 (11 years ago)1 September 2021 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$4,299

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2564480
Core clock speed497 MHz1140 MHz
Boost clock speed720 MHz1410 MHz
Number of transistors2,410 million54,200 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate7.952394.8
Floating-point processing power0.2545 TFLOPS12.63 TFLOPS
ROPs4128
TMUs16280
Tensor Coresno data280
L1 Cacheno data13.1 MB
L2 Cacheno data8 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 1.0 x4
WidthIGPIGP
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedHBM2e
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared8 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared4096 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1458 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data1.49 TB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)N/A
Shader Model6.0N/A
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA-8.0
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 17 September 2014 1 September 2021
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 250 Watt

R5 Graphics has 1566.7% lower power consumption.

CMP 170HX 8 GB, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R5 Graphics and CMP 170HX 8 GB. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R5 Graphics is a desktop graphics card while CMP 170HX 8 GB is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
Radeon R5 Graphics
NVIDIA CMP 170HX 8 GB
CMP 170HX 8 GB

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 1709 votes

Rate Radeon R5 Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.2 108 votes

Rate CMP 170HX 8 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R5 Graphics or CMP 170HX 8 GB, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.