Quadro FX 550M vs Radeon R5 (Carrizo)

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking982not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.72no data
ArchitectureGCN 1.2/2.0 (2015−2016)Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code nameCarrizoG73
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date4 June 2015 (10 years ago)13 March 2006 (19 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores256no data
Core clock speedno data480 MHz
Boost clock speed800 MHzno data
Number of transistors2410 Million177 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)12-35 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rateno data5.760
ROPsno data8
TMUsno data12

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 1.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR3
Maximum RAM amountno data512 MB
Memory bus width64/128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data500 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data16 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (FL 12_0)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Modelno data3.0
OpenGLno data2.1
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 June 2015 13 March 2006
Chip lithography 28 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 35 Watt

R5 (Carrizo) has an age advantage of 9 years, a 221.4% more advanced lithography process, and 191.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R5 (Carrizo) and Quadro FX 550M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R5 (Carrizo) is a notebook graphics card while Quadro FX 550M is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R5 (Carrizo)
Radeon R5 (Carrizo)
NVIDIA Quadro FX 550M
Quadro FX 550M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 6 votes

Rate Radeon R5 (Carrizo) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro FX 550M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R5 (Carrizo) or Quadro FX 550M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.