HD Graphics 12EU vs Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking909not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.81no data
ArchitectureGCN 1.2/2.0 (2015−2016)Generation 5.75 (2010)
GPU code nameBristol RidgeIronlake
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 June 2016 (9 years ago)10 January 2010 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38496
Core clock speedno data533 MHz
Boost clock speed800 MHzno data
Number of transistors3100 Million177 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm45 nm
Power consumption (TDP)12-45 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rateno data6.396
Floating-point processing powerno data0.1023 TFLOPS
ROPsno data2
TMUsno data12

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Interfaceno dataQPI
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountno dataSystem Shared
Memory bus width64/128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speedno dataSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataMotherboard Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (FL 12_0)10.1
Shader Modelno data4.1
OpenGLno data2.1
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 June 2016 10 January 2010
Chip lithography 28 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 35 Watt

R5 (Bristol Ridge) has an age advantage of 6 years, a 60.7% more advanced lithography process, and 191.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) and HD Graphics 12EU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) is a notebook graphics card while HD Graphics 12EU is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)
Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)
Intel HD Graphics 12EU
HD Graphics 12EU

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 27 votes

Rate Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 18 votes

Rate HD Graphics 12EU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) or HD Graphics 12EU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.