GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q 3 GB vs Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking902not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.83no data
ArchitectureGCN 1.2/2.0 (2015−2016)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameBristol RidgeGP106
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 June 2016 (9 years ago)27 June 2017 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3841280
Core clock speedno data1265 MHz
Boost clock speed800 MHz1480 MHz
Number of transistors3100 Million4,400 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)12-45 Watt80 Watt
Texture fill rateno data118.4
ROPsno data48
TMUsno data80

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountno data3 GB
Memory bus width64/128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speedno data8008 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data192.2 GB/s
Shared memory+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (FL 12_0)12.0
Shader Modelno data5.0
OpenGLno data4.5
OpenCLno data1.2
CUDA-6.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 June 2016 27 June 2017
Chip lithography 28 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 80 Watt

R5 (Bristol Ridge) has 566.7% lower power consumption.

GTX 1060 Max-Q 3 GB, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) and GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q 3 GB. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)
Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q 3 GB
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q 3 GB

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 26 votes

Rate Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 76 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q 3 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) or GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q 3 GB, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.