CMP 90HX vs Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking902not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.83no data
ArchitectureGCN 1.2/2.0 (2015−2016)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameBristol RidgeGA102
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date1 June 2016 (9 years ago)28 July 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3846400
Core clock speedno data1500 MHz
Boost clock speed800 MHz1710 MHz
Number of transistors3100 Million28,300 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)12-45 Watt320 Watt
Texture fill rateno data342.0
Floating-point processing powerno data21.89 TFLOPS
ROPsno data80
TMUsno data200
Tensor Coresno data200
Ray Tracing Coresno data50
L1 Cacheno data6.3 MB
L2 Cacheno data5 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 1.0 x4
Lengthno data285 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6X
Maximum RAM amountno data10 GB
Memory bus width64/128 Bit320 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1188 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data760.3 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (FL 12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 June 2016 28 July 2021
Chip lithography 28 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 320 Watt

R5 (Bristol Ridge) has 2566.7% lower power consumption.

CMP 90HX, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) and CMP 90HX. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) is a notebook graphics card while CMP 90HX is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)
Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)
NVIDIA CMP 90HX
CMP 90HX

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 26 votes

Rate Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 57 votes

Rate CMP 90HX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) or CMP 90HX, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.