RTX PRO 6000D Blackwell vs Radeon R5 A240

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1049not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.13no data
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026)
GPU code nameOlandGB202
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date2014 (12 years ago)18 March 2025 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$8,565

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores32024064
Core clock speed1030 MHz1590 MHz
Boost clock speed780 MHz2617 MHz
Number of transistors950 million92,200 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt600 Watt
Texture fill rate15.601,968.0
Floating-point processing powerno data126 TFLOPS
ROPs8192
TMUs20752
Tensor Coresno data752
Ray Tracing Coresno data188
L1 Cacheno data23.5 MB
L2 Cacheno data128 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 5.0 x16
Length168 mm304 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount2 GB96 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit512 Bit
Memory clock speed1800 MBps1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth28.8 GB/s1.79 TB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI 1.4a, 1x VGA4x DisplayPort 2.1b
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.5 (5.1)6.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.1 (1.2)3.0
Vulkan1.2.1701.4
CUDA-12.0
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 96 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 600 Watt

R5 A240 has 1100% lower power consumption.

RTX PRO 6000D Blackwell, on the other hand, has a 4700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R5 A240 and RTX PRO 6000D Blackwell. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R5 A240 is a desktop graphics card while RTX PRO 6000D Blackwell is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R5 A240
Radeon R5 A240
NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000D Blackwell
RTX PRO 6000D Blackwell

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 3 votes

Rate Radeon R5 A240 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 16 votes

Rate RTX PRO 6000D Blackwell on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R5 A240 or RTX PRO 6000D Blackwell, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.