RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell Embedded vs Radeon R5 A240

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1046not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.12no data
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026)
GPU code nameOlandGB203
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date2014 (12 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3207680
Core clock speed1030 MHz975 MHz
Boost clock speed780 MHz1702 MHz
Number of transistors950 million45,600 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt80 Watt
Texture fill rate15.60408.5
Floating-point processing powerno data26.14 TFLOPS
ROPs896
TMUs20240
Tensor Coresno data240
Ray Tracing Coresno data60
L1 Cacheno data7.5 MB
L2 Cacheno data64 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 5.0 x16
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount2 GB16 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1800 MBps1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth28.8 GB/s896.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI 1.4a, 1x VGAPortable Device Dependent
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.5 (5.1)6.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.1 (1.2)3.0
Vulkan1.2.1701.4
CUDA-12.0
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 80 Watt

R5 A240 has 60% lower power consumption.

RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell Embedded, on the other hand, has a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R5 A240 and RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell Embedded. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R5 A240 is a desktop graphics card while RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell Embedded is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R5 A240
Radeon R5 A240
NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell Embedded
RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell Embedded

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 3 votes

Rate Radeon R5 A240 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell Embedded on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R5 A240 or RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell Embedded, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.