Tesla M40 vs Radeon R5 A230

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance rankingnot rated188
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data80.16
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Maxwell 2.0 (2015−2019)
GPU code nameJetGM200
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date7 January 2014 (10 years ago)10 November 2015 (8 years ago)
Current priceno data$101

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3203072
Core clock speed780 MHz948 MHz
Boost clock speed855 MHz1112 MHz
Number of transistors690 million8,000 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data250 Watt
Texture fill rate17.10213.5
Floating-point performance547.2 gflops6,844 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data8-pin EPS

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB12 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz6 GB/s
Memory bandwidth16 GB/s288.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDAno data5.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 January 2014 10 November 2015
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 12 GB

We couldn't decide between Radeon R5 A230 and Tesla M40. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R5 A230 is a desktop card while Tesla M40 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R5 A230
Radeon R5 A230
NVIDIA Tesla M40
Tesla M40

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


This video card has no user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon R5 A230 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 75 votes

Rate Tesla M40 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.