GeForce MX450 30.5W 8Gbps vs Radeon R5 A230

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameJetTU117
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date7 January 2014 (11 years ago)25 August 2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores320896
Core clock speed780 MHz1035 MHz
Boost clock speed855 MHz1275 MHz
Number of transistors690 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data31 Watt
Texture fill rate17.1071.40
Floating-point processing power0.5472 TFLOPS2.285 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs2056
L1 Cache80 KB896 KB
L2 Cache128 KB512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x4
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB2 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth16 GB/s64 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2
CUDA-7.5

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 January 2014 25 August 2020
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm

R5 A230 has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

MX450 30.5W 8Gbps, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R5 A230 and GeForce MX450 30.5W 8Gbps. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R5 A230
Radeon R5 A230
NVIDIA GeForce MX450 30.5W 8Gbps
GeForce MX450 30.5W 8Gbps

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon R5 A230 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 12 votes

Rate GeForce MX450 30.5W 8Gbps on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R5 A230 or GeForce MX450 30.5W 8Gbps, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.