Radeon Pro Vega 16 vs R5 A220
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 456 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 11.81 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 (2009−2015) | GCN 5.0 (2017−2020) |
| GPU code name | Caicos | Vega 12 |
| Market segment | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 2014 (12 years ago) | 14 November 2018 (7 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 160 | 1024 |
| Core clock speed | 775 MHz | 815 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 1190 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 370 million | no data |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 6.200 | 76.16 |
| Floating-point processing power | no data | 2.437 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 4 | 32 |
| TMUs | 8 | 64 |
| L1 Cache | no data | 256 KB |
| L2 Cache | no data | 1024 KB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | no data | large |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 168 mm | no data |
| Width | 1-slot | no data |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | DDR3 | HBM2 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 1024 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MBps | 1200 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | 307.2 GB/s |
| Shared memory | no data | - |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI 1.3a | No outputs |
| HDMI | + | - |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 6.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
Pros & cons summary
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 75 Watt |
R5 A220 has 114% lower power consumption.
Pro Vega 16, on the other hand, has a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 186% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Radeon R5 A220 and Radeon Pro Vega 16. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Radeon R5 A220 is a desktop graphics card while Radeon Pro Vega 16 is a mobile workstation one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
