GeForce 9200M GS GDDR3 vs Radeon R5 430 OEM

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking874not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.78no data
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameOlandG98
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date30 June 2016 (9 years ago)3 June 2008 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3848
Core clock speed730 MHz529 MHz
Boost clock speed780 MHzno data
Number of transistors950 million210 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt13 Watt
Texture fill rate18.722.116
Floating-point processing power0.599 TFLOPS0.0208 TFLOPS
ROPs84
TMUs244
L1 Cache96 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KB16 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 2.0 x16
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount2 GB256 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1150 MHz702 MHz
Memory bandwidth36.8 GB/s11.23 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x DisplayPortPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model5.14.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA-1.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 30 June 2016 3 June 2008
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 13 Watt

R5 430 OEM has an age advantage of 8 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 96.4% more advanced lithography process.

9200M GS GDDR3, on the other hand, has 284.6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R5 430 OEM and GeForce 9200M GS GDDR3. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R5 430 OEM is a desktop graphics card while GeForce 9200M GS GDDR3 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM
Radeon R5 430 OEM
NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS GDDR3
GeForce 9200M GS GDDR3

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 481 votes

Rate Radeon R5 430 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate GeForce 9200M GS GDDR3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R5 430 OEM or GeForce 9200M GS GDDR3, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.