Tesla C2070 vs Radeon R5 340X OEM

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated560
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data2.39
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameOlandGF100
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date5 May 2015 (10 years ago)25 July 2011 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384448
Core clock speed900 MHz574 MHz
Boost clock speed1050 MHzno data
Number of transistors950 million3,100 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt238 Watt
Texture fill rate21.6032.14
Floating-point processing power0.6912 TFLOPS1.028 TFLOPS
ROPs848
TMUs2456

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 2.0 x16
Length145 mm248 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB6 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz747 MHz
Memory bandwidth16 GB/s143.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort1x DVI

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA-2.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 May 2015 25 July 2011
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 238 Watt

R5 340X OEM has an age advantage of 3 years, a 42.9% more advanced lithography process, and 266.2% lower power consumption.

Tesla C2070, on the other hand, has a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R5 340X OEM and Tesla C2070. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R5 340X OEM is a desktop graphics card while Tesla C2070 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM
Radeon R5 340X OEM
NVIDIA Tesla C2070
Tesla C2070

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 537 votes

Rate Radeon R5 340X OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Tesla C2070 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R5 340X OEM or Tesla C2070, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.