Radeon Pro Vega 64X vs R5 340X OEM

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated190
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data9.79
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameOlandVega 10
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date5 May 2015 (10 years ago)19 March 2019 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3844096
Core clock speed900 MHz1250 MHz
Boost clock speed1050 MHz1468 MHz
Number of transistors950 million12,500 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate21.60375.8
Floating-point processing power0.6912 TFLOPS12.03 TFLOPS
ROPs864
TMUs24256
L1 Cache96 KB1 MB
L2 Cache128 KB4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16
Length145 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3HBM2
Maximum RAM amount2 GB16 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit2048 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth16 GB/s512.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x DisplayPortNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.1.125

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 May 2015 19 March 2019
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 250 Watt

R5 340X OEM has 284.6% lower power consumption.

Pro Vega 64X, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R5 340X OEM and Radeon Pro Vega 64X. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R5 340X OEM is a desktop graphics card while Radeon Pro Vega 64X is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM
Radeon R5 340X OEM
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X
Radeon Pro Vega 64X

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 584 votes

Rate Radeon R5 340X OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 37 votes

Rate Radeon Pro Vega 64X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R5 340X OEM or Radeon Pro Vega 64X, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.