Quadro M6000 24 GB vs Radeon R5 340X OEM
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 226 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 1.13 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 8.58 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) | Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019) |
| GPU code name | Oland | GM200 |
| Market segment | Desktop | Workstation |
| Release date | 5 May 2015 (10 years ago) | 5 March 2016 (9 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $4,999 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 384 | 3072 |
| Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 988 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz | 1114 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 950 million | 8,000 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 21.60 | 285.2 |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.6912 TFLOPS | 6.844 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 8 | 96 |
| TMUs | 24 | 256 |
| L1 Cache | 96 KB | 1.1 MB |
| L2 Cache | 128 KB | 3 MB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 145 mm | 267 mm |
| Width | 1-slot | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 24 GB |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | 1653 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 16 GB/s | 317.4 GB/s |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | + |
| CUDA | - | 5.2 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 5 May 2015 | 5 March 2016 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 24 GB |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 250 Watt |
R5 340X OEM has 284.6% lower power consumption.
M6000 24 GB, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 months, and a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount.
We couldn't decide between Radeon R5 340X OEM and Quadro M6000 24 GB. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Radeon R5 340X OEM is a desktop graphics card while Quadro M6000 24 GB is a workstation one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
