AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM vs ATI Graphics Ultra Pro

General info

Comparison of graphics card architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters.

Place in our rating
not rated
 
not rated
Architecture
GCN 1.0
 
no data
GPU code name
Oland
 
Mach32
Market segment
Desktop
 
Desktop
Launch date
5 May 2015 (6 years ago)
 
1 January 1993 (28 years ago)
Price now
no data
 
$371

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores
384
 
no data
Core clock speed
900 MHz
 
10 MHz
Boost clock speed
1050 MHz
 
no data
Number of transistors
950 million
 
no data
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
 
800 nm
Thermal design power (TDP)
65 Watt
 
no data
Texture fill rate
21.60
 
no data
Floating-point performance
806.4 gflops
 
no data

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
 
VLB
Length
145 mm
 
no data
Supplementary power connectors
None
 
no data

Memory

Parameters of memory installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated VRAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type
DDR3
 
VRAM
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
 
1 MB
Memory bus width
64 Bit
 
64 Bit
Memory clock speed
2000 MHz
 
10 MHz
Memory bandwidth
16 GB/s
 
80.0 MB/s

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors
1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort
 
1x VGA

API support

APIs supported, including particular versions of those APIs.

DirectX
12 (11_1)
 
None
Shader Model
5.1
 
no data
OpenGL
4.6
 
None
OpenCL
1.2
 
None
Vulkan
1.2.131
 
-

Advantages of AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM

Much newer (5 May 2015 vs 1 January 1993)

Finer manufacturing process technology (28 vs 800 nm)

Advantages of ATI Graphics Ultra Pro

Higher memory bandwidth (80 vs 16 GB/s)

So, which one is the better GPU?

Technical City couldn't decide between AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM and ATI Graphics Ultra Pro. We've got no test results to judge.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Cast your vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM
ATI Graphics Ultra Pro
Like
Like

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of video cards with performance more or less close to those reviewed, providing you with more probable options to consider.

User rating

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

Advices and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.