GeForce GT 230 OEM vs Radeon R5 340 OEM

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameOlandG92B
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date5 May 2015 (10 years ago)27 April 2009 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38496
Core clock speed730 MHz500 MHz
Boost clock speed780 MHzno data
Number of transistors950 million754 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate18.7224.00
Floating-point processing power0.599 TFLOPS0.24 TFLOPS
ROPs812
TMUs2448
L1 Cache96 KBno data
L2 Cache128 KB48 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 2.0 x16
Length145 mmno data
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR2
Maximum RAM amount1 GB1536 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1150 MHz500 MHz
Memory bandwidth36.8 GB/s24 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x DisplayPortNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model5.14.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA-1.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 May 2015 27 April 2009
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 1536 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 75 Watt

R5 340 OEM has an age advantage of 6 years, a 96.4% more advanced lithography process, and 15.4% lower power consumption.

GT 230 OEM, on the other hand, has a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R5 340 OEM and GeForce GT 230 OEM. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R5 340 OEM
Radeon R5 340 OEM
NVIDIA GeForce GT 230 OEM
GeForce GT 230 OEM

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 58 votes

Rate Radeon R5 340 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 6 votes

Rate GeForce GT 230 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R5 340 OEM or GeForce GT 230 OEM, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.