GMA X4700MHD vs Radeon R5 330 OEM

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Generation 5.0 (2008)
GPU code nameHainanMontevina
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date5 May 2015 (11 years ago)1 October 2008 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores32080
Core clock speed830 MHz640 MHz
Boost clock speed855 MHzno data
Number of transistors690 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt13 Watt
Texture fill rate17.106.400
Floating-point processing power0.5472 TFLOPS0.1024 TFLOPS
ROPs81
TMUs2010
L1 Cache80 KBno data
L2 Cache128 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 1.0 x16
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount2 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed900 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)10.0
Shader Model5.14.0
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 May 2015 1 October 2008
Chip lithography 28 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 13 Watt

R5 330 OEM has an age advantage of 6 years, and a 132% more advanced lithography process.

GMA X4700MHD, on the other hand, has 285% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R5 330 OEM and GMA X4700MHD. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R5 330 OEM is a desktop graphics card while GMA X4700MHD is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 17 votes

Rate Radeon R5 330 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 4 votes

Rate GMA X4700MHD on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R5 330 OEM or GMA X4700MHD, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.