HD Graphics P4000 vs Radeon R5 240 OEM

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1017
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data2.07
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)Generation 7.0 (2012−2013)
GPU code nameOlandIvy Bridge GT2
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date1 November 2013 (11 years ago)14 May 2012 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384128
Core clock speed730 MHz650 MHz
Boost clock speed780 MHz1250 MHz
Number of transistors950 million1,200 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm22 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate18.7220.00
Floating-point processing power0.599 TFLOPS0.32 TFLOPS
ROPs81
TMUs2416

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 1.0 x16
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount2 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed900 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/sno data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGANo outputs
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)11.1 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.0
OpenGL4.64.0
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.1.80

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 November 2013 14 May 2012
Chip lithography 28 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 45 Watt

R5 240 OEM has an age advantage of 1 year.

HD Graphics P4000, on the other hand, has a 27.3% more advanced lithography process, and 11.1% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R5 240 OEM and HD Graphics P4000. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM
Radeon R5 240 OEM
Intel HD Graphics P4000
HD Graphics P4000

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 530 votes

Rate Radeon R5 240 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 99 votes

Rate HD Graphics P4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.