GeForce 8800 GTS 640 vs Radeon R5 240 OEM

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameOlandG80
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date1 November 2013 (12 years ago)8 November 2006 (19 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$449

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38496
Core clock speed730 MHz513 MHz
Boost clock speed780 MHzno data
Number of transistors950 million681 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt143 Watt
Texture fill rate18.7224.62
Floating-point processing power0.599 TFLOPS0.2281 TFLOPS
ROPs820
TMUs2424
L1 Cache96 KBno data
L2 Cache128 KB80 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 1.0 x16
Length168 mm267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount2 GB640 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit320 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz792 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s63.36 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA2x DVI, 1x S-Video
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model5.14.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 November 2013 8 November 2006
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 640 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 143 Watt

R5 240 OEM has an age advantage of 6 years, a 220% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 221.4% more advanced lithography process, and 186% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R5 240 OEM and GeForce 8800 GTS 640. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM
Radeon R5 240 OEM
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 640
GeForce 8800 GTS 640

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 600 votes

Rate Radeon R5 240 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 47 votes

Rate GeForce 8800 GTS 640 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R5 240 OEM or GeForce 8800 GTS 640, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.