Xbox Series X 6nm GPU vs Radeon R5 230

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1279not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.14no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameCaicosScarlett 6nm
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Designreferenceno data
Release date3 April 2014 (11 years ago)15 October 2024 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$599

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1603328
Core clock speedno data1825 MHz
Number of transistors370 million15,300 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)19 Watt200 Watt
Texture fill rate5.000379.6
Floating-point processing power0.2 TFLOPS12.15 TFLOPS
ROPs464
TMUs8208
L1 Cache16 KBno data
L2 Cache128 KB5 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 1.0 x4no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16no data
Length168 mm301 mm
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsN/Ano data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB10 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit320 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth10.67 GB/s560.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA1x HDMI 2.1
Eyefinity+-
HDMI++

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

CrossFire+-
​PowerPlay+no data
DDMA audio-no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.06.8
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan-1.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 April 2014 15 October 2024
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 10 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 19 Watt 200 Watt

R5 230 has 952.6% lower power consumption.

Xbox Series X 6nm GPU, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 years, a 150% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 566.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R5 230 and Xbox Series X 6nm GPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R5 230
Radeon R5 230
AMD Xbox Series X 6nm GPU
Xbox Series X 6nm GPU

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 262 votes

Rate Radeon R5 230 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 37 votes

Rate Xbox Series X 6nm GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R5 230 or Xbox Series X 6nm GPU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.