Riva TNT2 M64 Vanta vs Radeon R5 230

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1285not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.14no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Fahrenheit (1998−2000)
GPU code nameCaicosNV5 B5
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Designreferenceno data
Release date3 April 2014 (11 years ago)22 March 1999 (26 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores160no data
Core clock speedno data100 MHz
Number of transistors370 million15 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm250 nm
Power consumption (TDP)19 Wattno data
Texture fill rate5.0000.2
Floating-point processing power0.2 TFLOPSno data
ROPs42
TMUs82
L1 Cache16 KBno data
L2 Cache128 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 1.0 x4no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16AGP 4x
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsN/ANone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3SDR
Maximum RAM amount4 GB16 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speedno data133 MHz
Memory bandwidth10.67 GB/s1.064 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA1x VGA
Eyefinity+-
HDMI+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

CrossFire+-
​PowerPlay+no data
DDMA audio-no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 116.0
Shader Model5.0no data
OpenGL4.41.2
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 April 2014 22 March 1999
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 16 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 250 nm

R5 230 has an age advantage of 15 years, a 25500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 525% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R5 230 and Riva TNT2 M64 Vanta. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R5 230
Radeon R5 230
NVIDIA Riva TNT2 M64 Vanta
Riva TNT2 M64 Vanta

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 265 votes

Rate Radeon R5 230 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 15 votes

Rate Riva TNT2 M64 Vanta on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R5 230 or Riva TNT2 M64 Vanta, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.