Radeon RX 5900 XT vs R5 230

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1284not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.14no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameCaicosNavi 21
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Designreferenceno data
Release date3 April 2014 (11 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1604352
Boost clock speedno data1735 MHz
Number of transistors370 million21,000 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)19 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate5.000471.9
Floating-point processing power0.2 TFLOPS15.1 TFLOPS
ROPs496
TMUs8272
L1 Cache16 KBno data
L2 Cache128 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 1.0 x4no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsN/A2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB12 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speedno data14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth10.67 GB/s672.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
Eyefinity+-
HDMI++

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

CrossFire+-
​PowerPlay+no data
DDMA audio-no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1112 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model5.0no data
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.2no data

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 12 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 19 Watt 300 Watt

R5 230 has 1478.9% lower power consumption.

RX 5900 XT, on the other hand, has a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 471.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R5 230 and Radeon RX 5900 XT. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R5 230
Radeon R5 230
AMD Radeon RX 5900 XT
Radeon RX 5900 XT

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 264 votes

Rate Radeon R5 230 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 71 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5900 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R5 230 or Radeon RX 5900 XT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.