Radeon PRO W7800 48 GB vs R5 230

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1304not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.95no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026)
GPU code nameCaicosNavi 31
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Designreferenceno data
Release date3 April 2014 (12 years ago)13 April 2023 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$2,499

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1604480
Core clock speedno data1895 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2525 MHz
Number of transistors370 million57,700 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)19 Watt281 Watt
Texture fill rate5.000707.0
Floating-point processing power0.2 TFLOPS45.25 TFLOPS
ROPs4128
TMUs8280
Ray Tracing Coresno data70
L0 Cacheno data2.2 MB
L1 Cache16 KB2 MB
L2 Cache128 KB6 MB
L3 Cacheno data96 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 1.0 x4no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length168 mm280 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsN/A2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB48 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speedno data2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth10.67 GB/s864.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA3x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1
Eyefinity+-
HDMI+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

CrossFire+-
​PowerPlay+no data
DDMA audio-no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.06.8
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.22.2
Vulkan-1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 April 2014 13 April 2023
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 48 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 19 Watt 281 Watt

R5 230 has 1379% lower power consumption.

PRO W7800 48 GB, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 years, a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R5 230 and Radeon PRO W7800 48 GB. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R5 230 is a desktop graphics card while Radeon PRO W7800 48 GB is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 276 votes

Rate Radeon R5 230 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.7 6 votes

Rate Radeon PRO W7800 48 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R5 230 or Radeon PRO W7800 48 GB, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.