Quadro Plex 7000 vs Radeon R5 230

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1285not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.14no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code nameCaicosGF110
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Designreferenceno data
Release date3 April 2014 (11 years ago)25 July 2011 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$14,999

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores160512 ×2
Core clock speedno data574 MHz
Number of transistors370 million3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)19 Watt600 Watt
Texture fill rate5.00036.74 ×2
Floating-point processing power0.2 TFLOPS1.176 TFLOPS ×2
ROPs448 ×2
TMUs864 ×2
L1 Cache16 KB1 MB
L2 Cache128 KB768 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 1.0 x4no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length168 mm522 mm
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsN/Ano data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB6 GB ×2
Memory bus width64 Bit384 Bit ×2
Memory clock speedno data750 MHz
Memory bandwidth10.67 GB/s144.0 GB/s ×2

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA4x DVI, 2x S-Video
Eyefinity+-
HDMI+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

CrossFire+-
​PowerPlay+no data
DDMA audio-no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1112 (11_0)
Shader Model5.05.1
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan-N/A
CUDA-2.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 April 2014 25 July 2011
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 6 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 19 Watt 600 Watt

R5 230 has an age advantage of 2 years, and 3057.9% lower power consumption.

Plex 7000, on the other hand, has a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R5 230 and Quadro Plex 7000. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R5 230 is a desktop graphics card while Quadro Plex 7000 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R5 230
Radeon R5 230
NVIDIA Quadro Plex 7000
Quadro Plex 7000

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 265 votes

Rate Radeon R5 230 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 47 votes

Rate Quadro Plex 7000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R5 230 or Quadro Plex 7000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.