GeForce 9500M GE vs Radeon R5 230

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1304not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.95no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)no data
GPU code nameCaicosMCP79Mx + NB9M
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Designreferenceno data
Release date3 April 2014 (12 years ago)9 January 2008 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores16024
Number of transistors370 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)19 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate5.000no data
Floating-point processing power0.2 TFLOPSno data
ROPs4no data
TMUs8no data
L1 Cache16 KBno data
L2 Cache128 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 1.0 x4no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16no data
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsN/Ano data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR2, GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount4 GB256 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory bandwidth10.67 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGAno data
Eyefinity+-
HDMI+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

CrossFire+-
​PowerPlay+no data
DDMA audio-no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1110.0
Shader Model5.0no data
OpenGL4.4no data
OpenCL1.2no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 April 2014 9 January 2008
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 19 Watt 25 Watt

R5 230 has an age advantage of 6 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 63% more advanced lithography process, and 32% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R5 230 and GeForce 9500M GE. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R5 230 is a desktop graphics card while GeForce 9500M GE is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 276 votes

Rate Radeon R5 230 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce 9500M GE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R5 230 or GeForce 9500M GE, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.