ATI FirePro V3700 vs Radeon R5 230

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1281not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.14no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameCaicosRV620
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Designreferenceno data
Release date3 April 2014 (11 years ago)8 August 2008 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$99

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores16040
Core clock speedno data800 MHz
Number of transistors370 million181 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)19 Watt32 Watt
Texture fill rate5.0003.200
Floating-point processing power0.2 TFLOPS0.064 TFLOPS
ROPs44
TMUs84
L1 Cache16 KBno data
L2 Cache128 KB64 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 1.0 x4no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length168 mm168 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsN/ANone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount4 GB256 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speedno data950 MHz
Memory bandwidth10.67 GB/s15.2 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA2x DVI
Eyefinity+-
HDMI+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

CrossFire+-
​PowerPlay+no data
DDMA audio-no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1110.1 (10_1)
Shader Model5.04.1
OpenGL4.43.3
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 April 2014 8 August 2008
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 19 Watt 32 Watt

R5 230 has an age advantage of 5 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 37.5% more advanced lithography process, and 68.4% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R5 230 and FirePro V3700. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R5 230 is a desktop graphics card while FirePro V3700 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R5 230
Radeon R5 230
ATI FirePro V3700
FirePro V3700

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 262 votes

Rate Radeon R5 230 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 2 votes

Rate FirePro V3700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R5 230 or FirePro V3700, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.