Arc 130T Mobile vs Radeon R5 230

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1304not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.95no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Xe+ (2025)
GPU code nameCaicosArrow Lake-H
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Designreferenceno data
Release date3 April 2014 (12 years ago)13 January 2025 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores160896
Core clock speedno data300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2200 MHz
Number of transistors370 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)19 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate5.000123.2
Floating-point processing power0.2 TFLOPS3.942 TFLOPS
ROPs428
TMUs856
Tensor Coresno data112
Ray Tracing Coresno data7
L1 Cache16 KBno data
L2 Cache128 KB4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 1.0 x4no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsN/Ano data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount4 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speedno dataSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth10.67 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGAPortable Device Dependent
Eyefinity+-
HDMI+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

CrossFire+-
​PowerPlay+no data
DDMA audio-no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.06.8
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan-1.3
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 April 2014 13 January 2025
Chip lithography 40 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 19 Watt 35 Watt

R5 230 has 84% lower power consumption.

Arc 130T Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 years, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R5 230 and Arc 130T Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R5 230 is a desktop graphics card while Arc 130T Mobile is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 278 votes

Rate Radeon R5 230 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 33 votes

Rate Arc 130T Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R5 230 or Arc 130T Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.