ATI Radeon 9800 PRO 256-bit vs R4E Mobile Graphics

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)R300 (2003−2008)
GPU code nameBeemaR350
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date6 June 2014 (11 years ago)1 March 2003 (22 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores128no data
Core clock speed800 MHz380 MHz
Boost clock speed600 MHzno data
Number of transistors930 million117 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt47 Watt
Texture fill rate6.4003.040
Floating-point processing power0.2048 TFLOPSno data
ROPs48
TMUs88

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPAGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x Molex

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared128 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared340 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data21.76 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)9.0 (9_0)
Shader Model6.5 (6.0)no data
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCL2.1N/A
Vulkan1.2.170N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 June 2014 1 March 2003
Chip lithography 28 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 47 Watt

R4E Mobile Graphics has an age advantage of 11 years, a 435.7% more advanced lithography process, and 213.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R4E Mobile Graphics and Radeon 9800 PRO 256-bit. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R4E Mobile Graphics is a notebook graphics card while Radeon 9800 PRO 256-bit is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R4E Mobile Graphics
Radeon R4E Mobile Graphics
ATI Radeon 9800 PRO 256-bit
Radeon 9800 PRO 256-bit

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1 1 vote

Rate Radeon R4E Mobile Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon 9800 PRO 256-bit on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R4E Mobile Graphics or Radeon 9800 PRO 256-bit, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.